Repair methods
Mudjacking and slabjacking
If a section of driveway has dropped and now catches your car door, this is almost certainly the right fix and it is far cheaper than you are probably fearing. If your house has settled, it is almost certainly the wrong one. The distinction is worth getting straight before anyone quotes you.
How it works
- Drill. Holes are made through the sunken slab in a pattern — around an inch or more across for mudjacking, considerably smaller for foam.
- Pump. Material is injected beneath the slab, first filling the void that opened as the soil dropped away.
- Lift. Once the void is full, continued pumping pressurizes against the underside and raises the concrete. The crew watches the surface and works across the holes to control it.
- Patch. The holes are filled. They remain visible on close inspection, more so with mudjacking's larger holes.
Slurry or foam?
| Mudjacking (slurry) | Polyurethane foam | |
|---|---|---|
| Hole size | Around an inch or larger | Much smaller, roughly pencil width |
| Weight added | Heavy — it is cement and soil | A small fraction of slurry |
| Cure time | Hours to a day before loading | Minutes |
| Water resistance | Can wash out over time | Does not wash out |
| Void filling | Fills what it is pumped into | Expands into smaller gaps |
| General cost | $5 – $15 per sq ft | $8 – $25 per sq ft |
General industry ranges for orientation only — not quotes, and not binding on any contractor. Foundation Repair IQ does not set or quote prices.
The weight argument is the one that should carry most sway. The soil under that slab already failed to support it; adding a heavy cement slurry on top of that soil is not obviously the right response. Foam's lightness is not marketing — it is the main technical reason to pay the premium, alongside not washing out where water was the original culprit.
What it is genuinely good for
- Driveways and garage aprons that have dropped at a joint
- Sidewalks and walkways with a trip hazard at a slab edge
- Patios and pool decks that have settled or now drain the wrong way
- Garage floors where a section has sunk
- Steps and stoops that have pulled away from the house
In all of these the concrete itself is sound and the problem is what is — or is no longer — underneath it. That is exactly the problem slab lifting solves, usually in a few hours and for a fraction of what replacement would cost.
Where it is the wrong tool
Slab lifting fills a void. It does not create structural support and it does not reach soil capable of carrying a house. If a foundation has settled because the ground beneath it cannot hold the load, filling the gap does not change that — the slab will move again. For a settled house foundation the answer is underpinning, which transfers load onto competent bearing. Anyone proposing to mudjack a settled house foundation as the primary repair is worth a second opinion.
Also poor candidates: concrete that is badly broken up rather than simply sunk, where replacement is more sensible; slabs sitting over an active erosion or drainage problem that has not been addressed; and anything where the void keeps reopening, which is the ground telling you the cause is still running.
Questions worth asking
- What do you think caused the void, and is that cause being addressed?
- Slurry or foam, and why that one here?
- How long before I can drive or walk on it?
- How visible will the patched holes be?
- Is there any warranty, and what would void it?
- If this is near the house — are you confident this is flatwork and not the foundation?